qwoted vs connectively
Qwoted vs Connectively — features, pricing, and which to choose for your SEO workflow in 2026.
Quick Verdict
Both Qwoted and Connectively dominate the expert-source platform space, connecting journalists with subject matter experts for media mentions and backlinks. The choice between them often comes down to whether you want the polished, feature-rich experience of Qwoted or the straightforward, HARO-style approach of Connectively (formerly Help a Reporter Out).
Connectively carries the legacy of HARO, the original journalist-source matching service that built the entire category. Qwoted positions itself as the next evolution, with more sophisticated matching algorithms and professional networking features beyond simple query responses.
Feature Comparison
Qwoted offers a more comprehensive platform with advanced search filters, detailed journalist profiles, and relationship management tools. Their algorithm matches sources with relevant queries based on expertise areas, location, and past response quality. The platform includes networking features like direct messaging between sources and journalists, plus analytics showing your response rates and successful placements. Connectively maintains the traditional HARO format with daily email digests containing journalist queries organized by category. Sources respond via email, and the platform focuses on volume rather than sophisticated matching. While simpler, this approach has proven effective for millions of successful media placements over the years. Qwoted's interface resembles a professional social network, while Connectively sticks to the email-first workflow that made HARO famous. Qwoted provides more context about journalists and their publications, whereas Connectively keeps queries more anonymous until connection.
Pricing Comparison
Both platforms offer free tiers that provide access to journalist queries, making them accessible to individual professionals and small businesses. Qwoted's free plan includes basic query access and limited responses, while their paid plans add priority query access, advanced search, and relationship management tools. Connectively maintains the freemium model that made HARO successful, with premium subscriptions offering earlier query access, category filtering, and enhanced profile features. Their pricing remains competitive for agencies and PR professionals who need to manage multiple clients.
Best For
Qwoted works better for established PR professionals and agencies who want sophisticated matching, relationship tracking, and professional networking features. If you're building long-term journalist relationships and need detailed analytics on your outreach success, Qwoted's comprehensive platform delivers more value. Connectively suits individual professionals, small business owners, and anyone comfortable with the traditional HARO workflow. If you prefer email-based query delivery and straightforward response processes without extra features, Connectively's familiar approach gets the job done effectively.
The Verdict
Choose Connectively if you want the proven HARO formula with minimal learning curve and maximum query volume. For most individual professionals and small businesses, the straightforward email workflow and established journalist network provide everything needed for successful digital PR. Qwoted wins for agencies and PR professionals who need advanced features, relationship management, and detailed analytics to justify the additional complexity.