tinypng vs shortpixel
TinyPNG vs ShortPixel — features, pricing, and which to choose for your image optimization workflow in 2026.
Quick Verdict
TinyPNG and ShortPixel both tackle image optimization but serve different user needs. TinyPNG built its reputation on simplicity — drag, drop, download compressed images. ShortPixel positions itself as a more comprehensive optimization platform with advanced features like WebP/AVIF conversion and deep WordPress integration.
The choice often comes down to whether you need basic compression for occasional use or a full-featured optimization workflow for ongoing website management. TinyPNG excels at quick, one-off optimizations while ShortPixel targets users managing multiple sites or requiring advanced format conversion.
Feature Comparison
TinyPNG focuses exclusively on PNG and JPEG compression using smart lossy compression that maintains visual quality while reducing file sizes by 60-80%. The web interface is intentionally minimal — upload up to 20 images at once (5MB each), download individually or as a ZIP. The API supports bulk processing for developers, but format options remain limited to the core PNG/JPEG optimization. ShortPixel offers three compression levels (lossy, glossy, lossless) across more formats including PNG, JPEG, GIF, and WebP. The platform automatically generates WebP and AVIF versions for modern browsers while keeping original formats as fallbacks. Their WordPress plugin handles optimization automatically on upload, converts existing media libraries, and includes CDN integration. ShortPixel also processes PDF files and provides detailed optimization statistics. The API differences are significant. TinyPNG's API is straightforward but limited to basic compression. ShortPixel's API includes batch processing, format conversion, resizing, and webhook notifications for enterprise workflows.
Pricing Comparison
TinyPNG offers 500 free compressions monthly, then charges $0.009 per image via their API. There's no subscription model — you pay only for actual usage above the free tier. For most small websites, the free tier covers ongoing needs. ShortPixel provides 100 free monthly credits, then starts at $3.99/month for 10,000 images or $0.004-$0.006 per image for pay-as-you-go plans. Monthly subscriptions include priority processing and additional features like backup storage. For high-volume users, ShortPixel's per-image cost becomes significantly cheaper than TinyPNG's API pricing.
Best For
TinyPNG is better for designers, developers, or content creators who need occasional image optimization without ongoing subscriptions. If you're compressing product photos, blog images, or design assets sporadically, TinyPNG's free tier and simple interface provide exactly what you need. The straightforward API works well for custom applications requiring basic compression. ShortPixel is better for WordPress site owners, agencies managing multiple sites, or anyone needing modern format conversion. The WordPress plugin alone justifies the cost for most site owners, automatically optimizing new uploads and converting existing libraries. If you need WebP/AVIF support, PDF compression, or processing thousands of images monthly, ShortPixel's feature set and volume pricing make it the clear choice.
The Verdict
ShortPixel wins for most professional use cases. Unless you specifically need only basic PNG/JPEG compression for occasional use, ShortPixel's WordPress integration, modern format support, and competitive volume pricing provide better long-term value. TinyPNG remains excellent for quick, one-off compressions, but ShortPixel's comprehensive approach better serves ongoing optimization needs that actually move the needle on Core Web Vitals.