Home/Comparisons/sanity vs strapi

sanity vs strapi

Sanity vs Strapi — features, pricing, and which to choose for your SEO workflow in 2026.

Headless CMSVerified 2025-02-01

Quick Verdict

Best for budgetstrapi
Best for enterprisesanity
Most featuressanity
Easiest to usesanity

Choosing between Sanity and Strapi often comes down to development philosophy: do you want a sophisticated managed platform with powerful real-time features, or complete control with an open-source solution you can host anywhere? Both are serious headless CMS options for SEO-focused content strategies, but they serve different organizational needs.

The core difference lies in architecture and hosting. Sanity provides a fully managed cloud platform with advanced collaborative editing and structured content modeling, while Strapi gives you complete ownership through self-hosting with traditional database architecture and extensive plugin customization.

Feature Comparison

Sanity's standout feature is its real-time collaborative editing environment called Sanity Studio, where multiple editors can work simultaneously with live cursors and instant updates. Their GROQ query language provides powerful content filtering and relationships that translate directly to better SEO implementations. The structured content approach forces good information architecture from the start. Strapi takes a more traditional approach with a REST/GraphQL API builder that's immediately familiar to developers. Their content-type builder is visual and intuitive, while the role-based access control system offers granular permissions out of the box. The plugin ecosystem is extensive, with community-built solutions for everything from SEO meta fields to automated sitemap generation. For SEO specifically, Sanity's Content Lake architecture makes content reuse across multiple sites seamless, perfect for enterprise SEO strategies. Strapi's webhook system and built-in preview functionality make it easier to integrate with static site generators like Gatsby or Next.js for optimal performance.

Pricing Comparison

Both platforms offer generous free tiers, but the economics diverge quickly. Sanity's free plan includes unlimited projects and API requests with 3 users, then jumps to $99/month for the Growth plan with 10 users. Enterprise pricing starts around $949/month. Strapi is free for self-hosting with unlimited everything, but Cloud hosting starts at $99/month for basic managed hosting. Their Enterprise edition pricing isn't public but typically runs significantly higher than Sanity's managed offering when you factor in the infrastructure management overhead.

Best For

Sanity is the better choice when you need sophisticated content workflows, real-time collaboration, or plan to scale content across multiple properties. The managed infrastructure and advanced querying capabilities make it ideal for content teams that want to focus on strategy rather than server management. Enterprise organizations with complex approval processes will appreciate the advanced workflow features. Strapi works best when you need complete control over your hosting environment, want to minimize ongoing costs through self-hosting, or require extensive customization through plugins. It's perfect for agencies managing multiple client sites or organizations with strict data sovereignty requirements. The open-source nature means no vendor lock-in.

The Verdict

Choose Sanity if you value developer experience, real-time collaboration, and don't mind paying for managed infrastructure. Their content modeling approach and GROQ queries create better long-term content architecture for SEO. Choose Strapi if budget control, hosting flexibility, or extensive customization are priorities. For most SEO-focused content operations, Sanity's managed approach and superior collaborative features justify the higher cost.