clearbit vs clay
Clearbit vs Clay — features, pricing, and which to choose for your SEO workflow in 2026.
Quick Verdict
Both Clearbit and Clay are data enrichment platforms, but they serve different SEO use cases. Clearbit focuses primarily on audience understanding and lead qualification from organic traffic, while Clay specializes in automated prospect research and link building outreach. The choice between them depends on whether you prioritize website visitor enrichment or outreach automation.
SEOs typically consider Clearbit for understanding who's actually visiting their site from organic search, while Clay attracts those building systematic link building and outreach campaigns. Clearbit has deeper enterprise integrations and more established B2B data, but Clay offers more automation features and combines data from 75+ providers in one platform.
Feature Comparison
Clearbit excels at real-time visitor enrichment and company identification. Their Reveal product shows which companies visit your site from organic search, letting you understand your SEO audience at the company level. Their Enrichment API provides detailed firmographic data for qualifying leads from organic traffic, and their Prospector tool helps identify decision-makers within target companies. Clay takes a different approach with workflow automation and multi-provider data aggregation. Their platform connects to 75+ data sources including Apollo, ZoomInfo, and Hunter, letting you create automated research sequences for link building prospects. Clay's AI research agent can automatically find contact information, analyze websites, and score prospects based on custom criteria — particularly useful for scaling link building outreach. The core difference is depth versus breadth. Clearbit provides deeper, more reliable data for fewer use cases, while Clay offers broader automation capabilities with data from multiple sources.
Pricing Comparison
Clearbit uses custom enterprise pricing starting around $2,000-3,000 monthly for most implementations, though they offer a limited free tier for basic enrichment. Their pricing scales based on API calls and data volume, making it expensive for high-volume SEO campaigns but reasonable for qualifying organic traffic. Clay starts at $149/month for their Starter plan with 2,000 enrichment credits, scaling to $800/month for their Pro plan with 10,000 credits. While Clay's entry price is lower, costs can escalate quickly if you're enriching large prospect lists for link building campaigns. Clay doesn't offer a free tier. For most SEO teams, Clay provides better value for systematic outreach, while Clearbit is more cost-effective for understanding existing organic traffic.
Best For
Clearbit is the better choice when you need to understand and qualify your existing organic search traffic. If you're running content marketing campaigns and want to know which companies are finding you through SEO, or if you need reliable firmographic data to qualify leads from organic channels, Clearbit's depth and accuracy make it worthwhile despite the higher cost. Clay is the better choice for SEO teams focused on link building and outreach automation. If you're running systematic link building campaigns, need to research hundreds of prospects weekly, or want to automate the entire research-to-outreach process, Clay's multi-provider approach and workflow automation capabilities are more valuable than Clearbit's single-source data.
The Verdict
Choose Clay for most SEO use cases involving outreach and link building. Its automation features, multi-provider data access, and lower starting price make it better suited for scaling SEO outreach campaigns. Clearbit is only the better choice if you specifically need to understand your existing organic traffic audience or require the most accurate B2B data for qualifying high-value leads from search.