Home/Comparisons/writesonic vs textcortex

writesonic vs textcortex

Writesonic vs TextCortex — features, pricing, and which to choose for your SEO workflow in 2026.

AI WritingVerified 2025-02-01

Quick Verdict

Best for budgettextcortex
Best for enterprisewritesonic
Most featureswritesonic
Easiest to usetextcortex

Both Writesonic and TextCortex target content creators needing AI assistance, but they take fundamentally different approaches. Writesonic focuses heavily on SEO-optimized content generation with factual accuracy features, while TextCortex emphasizes customization through AI personas and brand voice training.

The choice typically comes down to whether you need Writesonic's specialized SEO tools and fact-checking capabilities, or TextCortex's flexibility for maintaining consistent brand voice across different content types.

Feature Comparison

Writesonic's standout feature is its web search integration for factual accuracy — it can verify claims and update content with current information, making it particularly valuable for news articles and data-driven content. The platform includes dedicated templates for SEO articles, product descriptions, and landing pages, plus Chatsonic (their ChatGPT alternative) with real-time web access. TextCortex takes a different approach with custom AI personas that learn your writing style and brand voice. You can create multiple personas for different clients or content types, and the AI maintains consistency across all generated content. Their browser extension integrates with virtually any text field, and they offer stronger multilingual support with 25+ languages compared to Writesonic's more limited language options. Both tools handle long-form content well, but Writesonic provides more structured templates for specific SEO use cases, while TextCortex gives you more control over tone and style customization.

Pricing Comparison

TextCortex starts completely free with 20 daily creations, making it accessible for testing and light use. Their paid plans begin around $23/month for unlimited generations. Writesonic offers a free tier with 10,000 words monthly, then jumps to $16/month for their Small Team plan with 100,000 words. The value equation depends on your usage patterns. TextCortex's unlimited model works better for high-volume creators, while Writesonic's word-based pricing can be more economical for businesses with predictable content needs. Writesonic's higher-tier plans include advanced SEO features and priority support that TextCortex doesn't match.

Best For

Writesonic is the better choice for SEO-focused content teams and agencies that need factual accuracy verification. If you're creating data-driven articles, news content, or need specific SEO optimization features like keyword integration and meta descriptions, Writesonic's specialized tools justify the investment. TextCortex works better for businesses with strong brand voice requirements and diverse content needs. If you're managing multiple clients with different styles, need extensive multilingual support, or want an AI that adapts to your specific writing patterns, TextCortex's persona system provides more flexibility.

The Verdict

For most SEO-focused use cases, Writesonic offers more value with its fact-checking capabilities and SEO-specific templates. However, TextCortex wins on flexibility and brand consistency. Choose Writesonic if factual accuracy and SEO optimization are priorities; choose TextCortex if brand voice control and multilingual content creation matter more to your workflow.