Home/Comparisons/alsoasked vs wordtracker

alsoasked vs wordtracker

AlsoAsked vs Wordtracker — features, pricing, and which to choose for your SEO workflow in 2026.

Keyword ResearchVerified 2025-02-01

Quick Verdict

Best for budgetalsoasked
Best for enterprisewordtracker
Most featureswordtracker
Easiest to usealsoasked

AlsoAsked and Wordtracker represent two fundamentally different approaches to keyword research. AlsoAsked specializes in mining Google's "People Also Ask" data to reveal question-based search patterns and topic clusters, while Wordtracker offers traditional keyword research with competition analysis and search volume data spanning over two decades of SEO evolution.

The choice between these tools comes down to whether you need focused question research for content planning (AlsoAsked) or comprehensive keyword intelligence for broader SEO campaigns (Wordtracker). They serve different stages of the research process and can actually complement each other well.

Feature Comparison

AlsoAsked excels at one specific task: extracting and visualizing the question-based searches that appear in Google's "People Also Ask" boxes. It creates interactive mind maps showing how questions relate to each other, helping content creators understand the full scope of user intent around a topic. The tool automatically discovers related questions you might never think to research manually, making it invaluable for FAQ sections, blog topic ideation, and understanding searcher psychology. Wordtracker provides traditional keyword research features including search volume estimates, competition analysis, keyword difficulty scores, and related keyword suggestions. It offers both broad and exact match data, tracks trending keywords, and includes features for monitoring competitor keywords. The platform also provides niche keyword discovery tools and long-tail keyword suggestions that many newer tools miss. The fundamental difference is scope: AlsoAsked gives you deep insight into question-based searches around specific topics, while Wordtracker gives you broad keyword intelligence across entire markets and niches.

Pricing Comparison

AlsoAsked starts at $15/month with a free tier that allows limited searches per day. The paid plans remove search limits and add features like CSV exports and team collaboration. For content creators who primarily need question research, this represents excellent value. Wordtracker costs $27/month starting price, reflecting its position as a comprehensive keyword research platform. The higher cost includes access to their full keyword database, competition analysis tools, and advanced filtering options. While more expensive than AlsoAsked, it provides significantly more keyword intelligence per dollar for traditional SEO campaigns.

Best For

AlsoAsked is ideal for content marketers, bloggers, and SEOs who focus heavily on creating comprehensive, question-answering content. If you're building FAQ sections, writing in-depth guides, or developing content clusters around specific topics, AlsoAsked's question-mapping capabilities are unmatched. It's particularly valuable for industries where people have many related questions, like healthcare, finance, or technology. Wordtracker suits SEOs and agencies who need comprehensive keyword research across multiple clients or projects. Its strength lies in traditional SEO campaign planning, competitor analysis, and discovering profitable niche keywords. The platform works best for established SEO professionals who understand how to interpret keyword difficulty and competition metrics effectively.

The Verdict

Choose AlsoAsked if you're primarily a content creator who wants to understand the full question landscape around your topics. Its specialized focus on "People Also Ask" data makes it irreplaceable for question-based content strategies. However, choose Wordtracker if you need full-spectrum keyword research capabilities for traditional SEO campaigns. Most SEO professionals will eventually need both types of data, making these tools complementary rather than competitive.